1963 Alpine A 110 vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Clio (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1963 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1963 Alpine A 110.
Because 1963 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alpine A 110 | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Alpine | Renault |
Model | A 110 | Clio |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 76.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 50 L |