1963 Aston Martin DB4 vs. 1951 Cadillac 62

To start off, 1963 Aston Martin DB4 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Aston Martin DB4 (310 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Aston Martin DB4 should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 527 kg more than 1963 Aston Martin DB4.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Aston Martin DB4. (377 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Aston Martin DB4.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Aston Martin DB4 1951 Cadillac 62
Make Aston Martin Cadillac
Model DB4 62
Year Released 1963 1951
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3670 cc 5422 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 310 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 377 Nm 423 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 96.8 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92 mm 92.1 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1225 kg 1752 kg
Vehicle Length 4270 mm 5480 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 2050 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1600 mm
Wheelbase Size 2370 mm 3210 mm