1963 Aston Martin DB4 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Aston Martin DB4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Aston Martin DB4 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Aston Martin DB4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Aston Martin DB4 weights approximately 415 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1963 Aston Martin DB4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Aston Martin DB4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Aston Martin DB4 | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mitsubishi |
Model | DB4 | Colt |
Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3670 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2310 mm |