1963 Aston Martin DB5 vs. 2001 BMW Compact
To start off, 2001 BMW Compact is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Aston Martin DB5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Aston Martin DB5 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Aston Martin DB5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Aston Martin DB5 (314 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2001 BMW Compact. (193 HP @ 7400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Aston Martin DB5 should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Compact. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Compact weights approximately 50 kg more than 1963 Aston Martin DB5.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Aston Martin DB5 (390 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Compact. (237 Nm). This means 1963 Aston Martin DB5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Compact.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Aston Martin DB5 | 2001 BMW Compact | |
Make | Aston Martin | BMW |
Model | DB5 | Compact |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 314 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 390 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 63 L |