1963 Aston Martin DB5 vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Aston Martin DB5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Aston Martin DB5 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Aston Martin DB5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Aston Martin DB5 (314 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2002 Volvo XC90. (197 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Aston Martin DB5 should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Aston Martin DB5 weights approximately 79 kg more than 2002 Volvo XC90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Aston Martin DB5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Aston Martin DB5 (390 Nm @ 3850 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1963 Aston Martin DB5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Aston Martin DB5 | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Volvo |
Model | DB5 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2519 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 314 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 390 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3850 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 93.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 72 L |