1963 Austin A 90 vs. 1982 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 1982 Fiat Argenta is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin A 90 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1963 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin A 90 | 1982 Fiat Argenta | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 90 | Argenta |
Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 35 L |