1963 Austin A 90 vs. 1995 BMW CLS
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 90.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin A 90. (221 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin A 90.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin A 90 | 1995 BMW CLS | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | A 90 | CLS |
Year Released | 1963 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3001 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1360 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2710 mm |