1963 Austin A 90 vs. 2000 Buick Cielo

To start off, 2000 Buick Cielo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Buick Cielo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Cielo (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Buick Cielo weights approximately 190 kg more than 1963 Austin A 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Buick Cielo (387 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin A 90. (221 Nm). This means 2000 Buick Cielo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin A 90. 2000 Buick Cielo has automatic transmission and 1963 Austin A 90 has manual transmission. 1963 Austin A 90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Buick Cielo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: