1963 Austin A 90 vs. 2009 Dodge Caliber

To start off, 2009 Dodge Caliber is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Caliber (285 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Caliber should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 90.

Because 1963 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Caliber, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Caliber (359 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin A 90. (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Caliber will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin A 90.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Austin A 90 2009 Dodge Caliber
Make Austin Dodge
Model A 90 Caliber
Year Released 1963 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 2360 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 285 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 359 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4420 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 51 L