1963 Austin A 99 vs. 1951 Buick LeSabre

To start off, 1963 Austin A 99 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,523 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Buick LeSabre (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 193 kg more than 1963 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Buick LeSabre (517 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin A 99. (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1951 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin A 99. 1951 Buick LeSabre has automatic transmission and 1963 Austin A 99 has manual transmission. 1963 Austin A 99 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1951 Buick LeSabre will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Austin A 99 1951 Buick LeSabre
Make Austin Buick
Model A 99 LeSabre
Year Released 1963 1951
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 3523 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 107 HP 335 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 224 Nm 517 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3650 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 82.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 82.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1723 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 5130 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 2020 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1280 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2930 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 151 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]