1963 Austin A 99 vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1965 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin A 99 (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin A 99 weights approximately 1030 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Austin A 99 (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1963 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin A 99 | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Austin | Suzuki |
Model | A 99 | Fronte |
Year Released | 1963 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 66 L |