1963 Austin A 99 vs. 1966 Lancia Flaminia

To start off, 1966 Lancia Flaminia is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lancia Flaminia (138 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lancia Flaminia should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin A 99 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1966 Lancia Flaminia.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Austin A 99 (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Lancia Flaminia. (222 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Lancia Flaminia.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Austin A 99 1966 Lancia Flaminia
Make Austin Lancia
Model A 99 Flaminia
Year Released 1963 1966
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 2775 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 107 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 224 Nm 222 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1520 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4690 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 56 L