1963 Austin A 99 vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1969 Zastava 850 K is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin A 99 (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin A 99 weights approximately 675 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin A 99 | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Austin | Zastava |
Model | A 99 | 850 K |
Year Released | 1963 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 846 cc |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2010 mm |