1963 Austin A 99 vs. 1972 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1972 Cadillac Calais is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 600 kg more than 1963 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin A 99 | 1972 Cadillac Calais | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 99 | Calais |
Year Released | 1963 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3310 mm |