1963 Austin A 99 vs. 1972 Mazda 110 S
To start off, 1972 Mazda 110 S is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda 110 S (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda 110 S should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin A 99 weights approximately 564 kg more than 1972 Mazda 110 S.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Austin A 99 (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1963 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Austin A 99 | 1972 Mazda 110 S | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | A 99 | 110 S |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 107 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2360 mm |
