1963 Austin A 99 vs. 1976 Rover 2000

To start off, 1976 Rover 2000 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Rover 2000 (142 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin A 99 weights approximately 198 kg more than 1976 Rover 2000.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Rover 2000 (272 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin A 99. (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1976 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin A 99.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Austin A 99 1976 Rover 2000
Make Austin Rover
Model A 99 2000
Year Released 1963 1976
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 3532 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 107 HP 142 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 224 Nm 272 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 2600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 88.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 71.1 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1332 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2640 mm