1963 Austin A 99 vs. 1984 Peugeot 205

To start off, 1984 Peugeot 205 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin A 99 (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1984 Peugeot 205. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1984 Peugeot 205. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin A 99 weights approximately 650 kg more than 1984 Peugeot 205. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Peugeot 205, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Austin A 99 (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Peugeot 205. (106 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1963 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Peugeot 205.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Austin A 99 1984 Peugeot 205
Make Austin Peugeot
Model A 99 205
Year Released 1963 1984
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 1768 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 107 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 224 Nm 106 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 87.9 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 23.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 880 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 3710 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1580 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2430 mm