1963 Austin A 99 vs. 1995 Opel Omega

To start off, 1995 Opel Omega is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Opel Omega (134 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin A 99 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1995 Opel Omega.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Austin A 99 (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Opel Omega. (185 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1963 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Opel Omega.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Austin A 99 1995 Opel Omega
Make Austin Opel
Model A 99 Omega
Year Released 1963 1995
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 107 HP 134 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 224 Nm 185 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 86 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1425 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2740 mm