1963 Austin A 99 vs. 2000 BMW 316

To start off, 2000 BMW 316 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin A 99 (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2000 BMW 316. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin A 99 weights approximately 220 kg more than 2000 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Austin A 99 (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 316. (150 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1963 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 316.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Austin A 99 2000 BMW 316
Make Austin BMW
Model A 99 316
Year Released 1963 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 1596 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 107 HP 105 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 224 Nm 150 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3900 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1310 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 63 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]