1963 Austin A 99 vs. 2000 Opel Omega

To start off, 2000 Opel Omega is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (218 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 180 kg more than 1963 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Omega (290 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin A 99. (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin A 99. 2000 Opel Omega has automatic transmission and 1963 Austin A 99 has manual transmission. 1963 Austin A 99 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Opel Omega will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Austin A 99 2000 Opel Omega
Make Austin Opel
Model A 99 Omega
Year Released 1963 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 3175 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 107 HP 218 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 224 Nm 290 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 10.0:1
Top Speed 162 km/hour 240 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1710 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 75 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]