1963 Austin A 99 vs. 2002 Opel Concept M
To start off, 2002 Opel Concept M is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Opel Concept M (148 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Opel Concept M should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin A 99 weights approximately 232 kg more than 2002 Opel Concept M.
Because 1963 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Opel Concept M, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Austin A 99 (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Opel Concept M. (205 Nm @ 1980 RPM). This means 1963 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Opel Concept M.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin A 99 | 2002 Opel Concept M | |
Make | Austin | Opel |
Model | A 99 | Concept M |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1980 RPM |
Top Speed | 162 km/hour | 202 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 52 L |