1963 Austin A 99 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 270 kg more than 1963 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin A 99. (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin A 99.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Austin A 99 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make Austin Jeep
Model A 99 Grand Cherokee
Year Released 1963 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 3966 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 107 HP 195 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 224 Nm 312 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 8.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1800 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4610 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 78 L