1963 Austin A 99 vs. 2005 Holden UTE

To start off, 2005 Holden UTE is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin A 99 weights approximately 30 kg more than 2005 Holden UTE.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin A 99. (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin A 99.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Austin A 99 2005 Holden UTE
Make Austin Holden
Model A 99 UTE
Year Released 1963 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 3789 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 107 HP 204 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 224 Nm 305 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1500 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 5060 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2950 mm