1963 Austin A 99 vs. 2009 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2009 Toyota Tundra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Tundra (276 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin A 99 weights approximately 450 kg more than 2009 Toyota Tundra.

Because 2009 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Austin A 99. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Tundra (424 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin A 99. (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin A 99. 2009 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1963 Austin A 99 has manual transmission. 1963 Austin A 99 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Austin A 99 2009 Toyota Tundra
Make Austin Toyota
Model A 99 Tundra
Year Released 1963 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 4664 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 107 HP 276 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 224 Nm 424 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 9.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 3 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1080 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 5340 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 2040 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1940 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 3230 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 100 L