1963 Austin A 99 vs. 2010 Nissan Note
To start off, 2010 Nissan Note is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin A 99 (107 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin A 99 weights approximately 478 kg more than 2010 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin A 99 | 2010 Nissan Note | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 99 | Note |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2600 mm |