1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1948 Simca 6
To start off, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Simca 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Simca 6 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1948 Simca 6. (16 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1948 Simca 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 610 kg more than 1948 Simca 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1948 Simca 6 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Simca |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | 6 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1330 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2010 mm |
