1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1949 Renault Juva
To start off, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Renault Juva would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP) has 122 more horse power than 1949 Renault Juva. (24 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1949 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 370 kg more than 1949 Renault Juva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1949 Renault Juva | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Juva |
Year Released | 1963 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1003 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 24 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2360 mm |