1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1958 DKW Munga
To start off, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1958 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 70 kg more than 1958 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1958 DKW Munga | |
Make | Austin-Healey | DKW |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Munga |
Year Released | 1963 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2010 mm |