1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1962 Holden EK
To start off, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (165 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1962 Holden EK | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Holden |
Model | 3000 Mk III | EK |
Year Released | 1963 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 164 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |