1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer
To start off, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer weights approximately 720 kg more than 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Jeep |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Grand Wagoneer |
Year Released | 1963 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5898 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2800 mm |