1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1970 Chevrolet Chevelle
To start off, 1970 Chevrolet Chevelle is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 7,441 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Chevrolet Chevelle (678 Nm) has 513 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (165 Nm). This means 1970 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1970 Chevrolet Chevelle | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Chevelle |
Year Released | 1963 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 7441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 678 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2950 mm |