1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111
To start off, 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111. (141 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111 (276 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (165 Nm). This means 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | C 111 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 141 HP |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 276 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 84 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
