1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1996 Vauxhall Astra
To start off, 1996 Vauxhall Astra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1996 Vauxhall Astra. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1996 Vauxhall Astra.
Because 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Vauxhall Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (165 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Vauxhall Astra. (127 Nm). This means 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Vauxhall Astra.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1996 Vauxhall Astra | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Vauxhall |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Astra |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 127 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |