1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1999 Ford Windstar
To start off, 1999 Ford Windstar is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Because 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1999 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3066 mm |
