1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 2002 Riley MR II
To start off, 2002 Riley MR II is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 7,996 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Riley MR II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 120 kg more than 2002 Riley MR II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 2002 Riley MR II | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Riley |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | MR II |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 7996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2650 mm |
