1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 271 kg more than 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Because 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (165 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Volvo |
Model | 3000 Mk III | C30 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |