1963 Austin Mini Cooper vs. 1942 Renault Juva
To start off, 1963 Austin Mini Cooper is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,071 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Austin Mini Cooper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin Mini Cooper (67 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1942 Renault Juva. (24 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin Mini Cooper should accelerate faster than 1942 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Renault Juva weights approximately 126 kg more than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper.
Because 1942 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Austin Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin Mini Cooper | 1942 Renault Juva | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | Mini Cooper | Juva |
Year Released | 1963 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1071 cc | 1003 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 816 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2360 mm |