1963 Austin Mini Cooper vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1963 Austin Mini Cooper is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper. (67 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1510 kg more than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1963 Austin Mini Cooper has manual transmission. 1963 Austin Mini Cooper will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin Mini Cooper | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Mini Cooper | 62 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1071 cc | 6382 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 2200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 79 L |