1963 Austin Mini Cooper vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin Mini Cooper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin Mini Cooper would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper. (67 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (106 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper. (84 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin Mini Cooper | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | Mini Cooper | Megane |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1071 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 60 L |