1963 Austin Mini Cooper vs. 2009 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2009 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin Mini Cooper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin Mini Cooper would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Proton Gen-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Proton Gen-2 (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper. (67 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Proton Gen-2 should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Proton Gen-2 (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper. (84 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Proton Gen-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Austin Mini Cooper | 2009 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Austin | Proton |
| Model | Mini Cooper | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 1071 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2610 mm |
