1963 Austin Princess vs. 1954 Chevrolet Corvette
To start off, 1963 Austin Princess is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Chevrolet Corvette (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1963 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin Princess weights approximately 887 kg more than 1954 Chevrolet Corvette.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Austin Princess | 1954 Chevrolet Corvette | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | Princess | Corvette |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3992 cc | 3859 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1293 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |
