1963 Austin Princess vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1963 Austin Princess is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1963 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin Princess weights approximately 55 kg more than 1959 Cadillac 62.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1963 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1963 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Austin Princess | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Princess | 62 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3992 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 79 L |
