1963 Austin Princess vs. 1983 Pininfarina Coupe
To start off, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe (125 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1963 Austin Princess. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin Princess.
Because 1963 Austin Princess is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Austin Princess. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Austin Princess (251 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Pininfarina Coupe. (176 Nm). This means 1963 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Pininfarina Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin Princess | 1983 Pininfarina Coupe | |
Make | Austin | Pininfarina |
Model | Princess | Coupe |
Year Released | 1963 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 125 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2450 mm |