1963 Austin Princess vs. 1986 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1986 Jaguar XJR is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin Princess would be higher. At 6,499 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 553 more horse power than 1963 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin Princess weights approximately 1320 kg more than 1986 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Austin Princess | 1986 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Austin | Jaguar |
| Model | Princess | XJR |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3992 cc | 6499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 671 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 90 L |
