1963 Austin Princess vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 1995 Rover 200 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1963 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin Princess weights approximately 995 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Austin Princess (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1963 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Austin Princess | 1995 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Austin | Rover |
| Model | Princess | 200 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3992 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1410 mm |
