1963 Austin Princess vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR

To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin Princess would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1963 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin Princess weights approximately 515 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJR.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin Princess. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin Princess. 2002 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1963 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1963 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Austin Princess 2002 Jaguar XJR
Make Austin Jaguar
Model Princess XJR
Year Released 1963 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3992 cc 4196 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 390 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 525 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 9.1:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 1665 kg
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 3360 mm 2910 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 85 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]