1963 Austin Princess vs. 2003 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1963 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin Princess.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin Princess. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin Princess | 2003 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | Princess | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 3494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 3060 mm |