1963 Austin Princess vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin Princess would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1963 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 242 kg more than 1963 Austin Princess. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin Princess | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Princess | E-350 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 132 L |