1963 Austin Princess vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1963 Austin Princess. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin Princess weights approximately 469 kg more than 2005 Lincoln LS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Austin Princess | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Austin | Lincoln |
Model | Princess | LS |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 3932 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1711 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 68 L |