1963 Autobianchi Bianchina vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 350 kg more than 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina.
Because 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Renault |
| Model | Bianchina | Clio |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 95 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 585 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1950 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 50 L |
